The Three Blind Mice Beat Manny Pacquiao, Not Timothy Bradley

By Ronald "RC" Cameron

Usually after a big fight, I'll write a review shortly afterwards but after what I watched last weekend, I needed some time to cool off.  Three days after the fight, I'm still ticked off about what went down last Saturday night. We all know by now that Timothy Bradley is now the new WBO Welterweight Champion after "beating" Manny Pacquiao via a controversial (understatement of the year), split decision. Before I begin my mini-rant, let me first state that I have respect for Timothy Bradley as a fighter and he seems like a stand-up guy. He his moments and he took some big shots from Pacquiao and kept coming, but in all due respect to the new champ, Manny Pacquiao gave him a boxing lesson and Bradley was not consistently effective when he was aggressive. I scored the fight 119-109 for Manny. I watched the fight again 2 more times and I scored it the same way, only giving Bradley the 10th round.

Highway robbery.  No other way to put it.

 I've been watching boxing for over 35 years and I've seen my share of boxing travesties, but considering what was at stake, this one may have topped them all.  Am I totally shocked by this? In a word, no. This sort of thing has been taking place for MANY years. In the last 11 months, there have been several terrible decisions (Paul Williams vs Erislandy Lara and Brandon Rios vs Richard Abril come to mind) and there have been other fights that took place on a bigger stage in the past that ended just as bad ( Pernell Whitaker vs Julio Cesar Chavez, Lennox Lewis vs Evander Holyfield I, just to name a few) yet the outcome of this fight has angered so many fans who now believe we will never see the super-fight we all have been waiting for.  To the many fans who believe that fight will never take place: I believe the fight will still happen at some point. Remember how long it took before Sugar Ray Leonard finally fought Marvelous Marvin Hagler?  Exactly.


Who's Responsible For This Travesty: Bob Arum and The Judges 


So who is to blame for this travesty? Most boxing fans are pointing the finger at Top Rank's commander in chief, Bob Arum because he promotes both guys and he already had November 10th date reserved for Manny's next PPV fight. Arum said this after the fight: "I'll make a lot of money off the rematch, but this was outrageous."  Need I say more?  There are also people in the boxing media speculating that Pacquiao is considering leaving Arum and if that's the case, good for him. Most boxing promoters are like pimps and for the past 6 years, Manny has been Arum's number one "bottom bi%^$." But like a good pimp, (not that there is really such a thing) Arum knows that his top money maker is starting to slow down so he's trying to milk every but of use out of him before he does leave him.

Oscar De La Hoya and Floyd Mayweather both were promoted by Arum but once they both figured things out, they both were smart enough to leave him and promote themselves. Sugar Ray Leonard provided the best blueprint on how to promote himself and make millions and Oscar and Floyd took it to the next level. No one knows how long Pacquiao will continue to fight, but it's clear that he needs to leave Top Rank. The one thing that did puzzle me was watching Manny's reaction after losing the fight. When fighters are robbed, I mean REALLY robbed, they react accordingly. You all remember how Marvelous Marvin Hagler reacted to losing to Sugar Ray Leonard (That was NOT a robbery by the way) and who can forget Larry Holmes epic, "Kiss where the sun don't shine!" rant after losing to Michael Spinks for the second time (now THAT was a robbery) yet at the end of the Pac-Bradley fight after the decision was announced,  Pacquiao was all smiles and in a good mood . I have a lot of respect for Pacquiao; he's been the most exiting fighter in boxing for many years, but his reaction to being robbed was a bit odd to me.

And I know you didn't think I would forget about those blind judges, now did you?  I've mentioned this many times over the past year that several boxing judges have been horrendous and inconsistent as of late. While appearing on a radio show in Atlanta, former 3-time Light Heavyweight Champion Antonio Tarver took it a step further and suggested that those three judges "need to go to school and get a degree... in judging" and I totally agree with him.  And I know judge Jerry Roth scored the fight 115-113 for Pacquiao yet I still question what fight he was watching. As for judges Duane Ford and C.J. Ross, both of them should be fired on the spot. And to take this a step further, I'd like to see an independent investigator go and investigate all three judges.

Moving forward, we all know what's going to probably happen. Manny won't leave Arum, he will fight Bradley in November and will dismantle him and then maybe we will be closer to seeing the fight we REALLY want to see. In my opinion, Arum just wanted to get another payday out of Pacquiao in the event that Manny does leave him after the Bradley rematch. It's really a win-win for Bradley, Pacquiao and Arum if you look at it, yet us boxing fans are the ones who continue to buy the PPV's and put up with this crap.  I'm not going to go as far as boycotting the Pacquiao vs Bradley rematch, but I'll be damned if I will ever pay for another Bob Arum-led PPV again. I'm a boxing fan for life, so I'll watch the replay of his PPV fights but Arum won't get another red cent out of me until he gets his act together and starts to give die hard boxing fans fights we want to see and I would not hold my breath for that if I were him. And I'm now convinced that it's not Pacquiao or Mayweather who was holding up their potential showdown; it was Arum all along.

And please, don't come at me with the "he got what he deserved", "karma" excuse. I'm referring to those who feel that Manny got what was coming to him in part because of what happened last November in Vegas when Manny fought Juan Manuel Marquez for the third time and won a controversial majority decision. And thinking that way also speaks to how certain fans and boxing media members REALLY feel about Manny Pacquiao for whatever reason. For the record, I thought Marquez won that fight by a point, but I didn't have a problem at all with Manny winning the fight and I would not have protested if the fight would have been ruled a draw. It was a close fight. There's a difference between being ROBBED or losing a close fight and what we saw last weekend was a travesty at the highest level.

I've thought about different reasons as to why this happened this way and there is one more thing that no one is really talking about. Manny offended A LOT of people with his recent comments stating that he's against gay marriages and maybe someone who's in a position of power might have held that against him. For the record, I support gay marriages. I have friends who are gay and I believe they should have the right to live their lives in any way they choose to. But Manny Pacquiao is a huge name worldwide and his comments really rubbed people the wrong way and maybe he offended the wrong person (meaning one of the two judges or Arum).  And again, let me clear: I'm not saying that this is the reason why Manny got screwed, I'm just throwing this out there as a possible conspiracy theory.  


Until There's A National Commission In Place, This Will Continue And Promoters Will Laugh All The Way To The Bank


So how do we fix this?  I've said this for many years: Boxing needs a national commission. Whether it's a group of guys or one person, someone who has the authority to step in and do something about these corrupt judges and promoters who are as I mentioned before, that are no better than pimps. Judges and promoters are rarely held accountable for their incompetence and that needs to change. I really feel bad for the fighters because they're the ones who put their lives on the line when they step in the ring and once they can no longer profit the promoters, their treated like crap. Boxing is in some trouble right now. I'm not going to go as far as to say boxing is dead, but it's in the hospital emergency room and will be headed to hospice if it doesn't get its act together soon. Boxing fans--do what you want, continue to buy Arum's PPV's if you so choose but continuing to accept this nonsense will not solve the problem, it will only add to it.

Floyd Mayweather Dismantles Miguel Cotto: So What's Next For The Pound For Pound King?

By Ronald "RC" Cameron

Since boxing started to become popular in the early 1900's, there has always been a plethora of great fighters and many of them fought each other just for the sake of wanting to prove who was the best.  And during those periods of time, there was always a fighter that stood above all others who was considered to be the face of boxing at that particular time.  Hall of Fame legends like Jack Johnson, Jack Dempsey, Joe Louis, Sugar Ray Robinson, Muhammad Ali and Sugar Ray Leonard all at some point in their careers were on top of the boxing world. Whether they loved them or hated them, fans would fill up stadiums all across the world to see them win, or get knocked out. Today, there are many boxing fans who believe the current face of boxing is the 8-division World Champion and current WBO Welterweight Champion Manny "Pac-Man" Pacquiao. The "Fighter of the Decade" (2000-2009) is arguably the most exiting fighter in the sport and is a HUGE PPV draw, but there is another guy who is a notch above him in terms of skill and popularity and that man is none other than Floyd "Money" Mayweather, who last Saturday night dismantled the future Hall of Fame Puerto Rican legend, Miguel Cotto over 12, hard fought, entertaining rounds, winning the WBA Jr. Middleweight title in the process.

So why is Floyd the best fighter on the planet? It's not because he's the biggest draw in the sport and it has nothing to do with his undefeated record. Floyd is the best fighter in the sport because he's most skilled, best defensive/counter puncher in the game and has fought several Hall of Fame caliber fighters over the past 10 years and has dominated all of them. If you want to compare him to other all time greats who are close to his size, he's a cross between Sugar Ray Leonard and Pernell Whitaker. Floyd may not be as fast as Leonard or as great defensively as Whitaker, but he's not that far off.  In terms of boxing skills, Floyd is in Leonard and Whitaker's class and he's a better counter-puncher than the two of them. The one thing that Floyd lacks is Leonard's killer instinct, but he makes up for it with his accuracy and counter-punching. I'm not ready to say that he's better than Leonard or even Whitaker, but Floyd is definitely in the conversation.

As for Floyd's performance against Cotto, I was very impressed with how Floyd adjusted to Cotto's tactics during the course of the fight. When Cotto wanted to brawl with Floyd on the ropes, Floyd stayed on the ropes and picked him apart with counter right hands, similar to how Muhammad Ali carved up George Foreman in Zaire 38 years ago. And when the two fought in the center of the ring, Floyd was even more effective, as he landed short jabs to the chest (that drains his opponent's energy) and looping right hands and uppercuts when they fought in close quarters. And while Cotto did get in a few good power shots, mainly in the middle rounds, he could never land more than one punch at a time because Floyd blocked many of those shots with his glove or shoulder. The only knock on Floyd was that he had trouble avoiding Cotto's left jab at times, but I'm nit-picking. Every fighter gets hit, even defensive wizards like Floyd, yet it was a rare sight seeing Floyd being hit with clean jabs which caused his nose to bleed.  But like a true champion, Floyd took command of the fight in the championship rounds and if he tried to go for the knockout in the final round, I think Cotto was ripe for the picking because Floyd hurt him badly with a short left uppercut midway through the 12th round and was ready to go. But Floyd still fought hard in the 12th and clearly won the round and the fight (I scored it 116-112 for Floyd).

Couple of thoughts about the aftermath of this fight—Kudos to Floyd for bury the hatchet with Larry Merchant. Both were in the wrong last time when the two had their famous dust-up after the Ortiz fight, but both Floyd and Larry showed class by putting their altercation behind them. I'm not convinced that the two will exchange Christmas cards in the future, but nevertheless, a nice gesture by both men. And if that wasn't enough, right after Floyd's interview with Larry, Floyd joined Jim Lampley and Emanuel Steward at ringside and gave them an interview. What I didn't like seeing was Miguel Cotto refusing to grant an interview right after the fight. I know he lost and was disappointed, but he fought a very good fight and he should have conducted the interview. Cotto is usually gracious when he wins or loses, but for whatever reason, he did not handle things well after his fight with Mayweather.

There are some critics who believe Floyd has lost a step all because he was hit with some decent shots which made his nose bleed but I don't see it that way, in fact, I believe this fight with Cotto will help him going forward. Mayweather proved to his naysayers that he can stand toe to toe with a hard-punching slugger like Cotto and beat him at his own game, but he's done this before. Let's not forget— Floyd fought as a Jr. Middleweight 5 years ago when he challenged Oscar De La Hoya in what was the biggest PPV fight in boxing history. Floyd agreed to fight Oscar with "pillows"(10 ounce gloves) which was something Oscar insisted on, yet he still gave Oscar a boxing lesson (I know the fight was a split decision according to the judges, but I thought Floyd clearly won the fight 116-112).  Just as he did with Oscar 5 years ago, Floyd fought the Jr. Middleweight champion at his weight without a "catch-weight"—just like the old school legends of the past that moved up in weight to challenge champions (Like Henry Armstrong, Roberto Duran, Sugar Ray Leonard and others).

So what's next for Floyd Mayweather?  We know what Floyd has to deal with next month, but after he gets through that, who should Floyd fight next?  Many boxing fans would like to see Floyd take on the young lion Saul "Canelo" Alvarez, who on the under card delivered a brutal beating to future Hall of Fame warrior Shane Mosley.  Alvarez was impressive against Mosley, but this was a shot, Shane Mosley who hasn't looked good in 3 years. If Floyd does fight Alvarez next, I'm sure the fight would do HUGE PPV numbers, but Floyd's on a whole different level and Floyd could ruin this kid's career before it really gets started if they faced.

If  the Canelo Alvarez fight can't be made at this time, then what about Amir Khan? I know Khan lost his last fight to Lamont Peterson, but the fight was close and I actually thought Khan did enough to win it. And with the recent news that Peterson failed a drug test, the Khan-Peterson rematch is in serious jeopardy, so that would leave the door open for Khan to challenge Mayweather this fall.  Khan is inconsistent, but he has two things going for him that could give Floyd some trouble: Khan is a good combination puncher and he has an excellent left jab. We all saw how Floyd had trouble avoiding Cotto's jab and Cotto is nowhere near as fast as Khan, so a Mayweather vs. Khan battle could be interesting.

Both of those fights would be good ones to watch, but the fight I would like to see (besides the obvious one) would be Floyd Mayweather moving up to the Middleweight division to challenge the TRUE Middleweight king, Sergio "Marivilla" Martinez. Both Mayweather and Martinez are fast, athletic fighters who rely on their hand speed and counter-punching ability and while Martinez is a Middleweight, he's a small Middleweight. And Floyd would not need to weigh 160 pounds going into that fight— he could come in at 155 and still maintain his insane hand speed and quickness. This fight would prepare Floyd for that other fight we all want to see because like Pacquiao, Martinez is a fast southpaw who has a deadly left cross. Floyd is always looking for a challenge, so taking on the man who's widely considered to be the third best fighter on the planet in his division would be a HUGE challenge.

This all sounds great and there are other possible opponents (James Kirkland, Paul Williams, Chavez Jr) , but I can't avoid the obvious. As great as those fights would be, NOTHING would compare to the MEGA showdown boxing fans have been clamoring for since 2008: The fight that would prove once and for all who's the REAL pound for pound king—Floyd "Money" Mayweather vs Manny "Pac Man" Pacquiao.  Call me naive, but I do believe we will see this fight take place at some point. I strongly believe that Floyd Mayweather and Manny Pacquiao both want this fight in the worst way, but there is one man who's preventing this fight from taking place—Bob Arum. Floyd just made a guaranteed 32 million fighting Cotto and will make even more with PPV sales, so he doesn't need the money. And Pacquiao makes a lot of money per fight, so he's not hurting for money either. But the difference between the two is that Manny Pacquiao is Bob Arum's golden goose and if Floyd fights Manny, if (and when) he loses to Floyd, Arum would lose his cash cow and his position of power.

What Floyd doesn't get enough credit for is the fact that he's a smart businessman who learned everything there is to know about promoting while working for Arum and Floyd is now using what he learned against his former boss (Oscar did the same thing) and now he's the one who's calling the shots.  Floyd knows his value, so he when he refuses to accept a 50-50 deal for facing Pacquiao, he can do that because he knows he's a bigger PPV draw than Manny. If Arum was in the same position of power (and he has been MANY times in his career) he would do the exact same thing. As the old saying goes, "It ain't no fun when the rabbit has the gun" and Floyd is the one with the gun.  I don't blame Floyd for taking this stand, but I do miss the good old days when GREAT fighters fought each other without all of the promotional mud-slinging.

But with that being said, I don't believe we will see Mayweather vs Pacquiao for at least another year.  If Pacquiao can get past undefeated former Jr. Welterweight king, Timothy Bradley (not an easy task, but Manny should prevail) , Manny will have to look for another dance partner. In a perfect world, Manny will take care of business against Bradley and Floyd and Manny will agree to fight this November. Floyd is 35 years old and Manny will turn 34 this December, so both of them are not getting any younger. Since the two are closer to the end of their careers and considering how Floyd was willing to trade bombs with the bigger, stronger Cotto, this potential super fight could be a very exiting battle, similar to what we saw last Saturday night, but even more explosive because Pacquiao is a better fighter than Cotto and is a harder puncher.  One thing is for sure: Mayweather and Pacquiao are the two biggest stars in the sport, yet there can only be ONE guy that stands alone as the face of boxing. In the famous words of the greatest wrestler of all time, Nature Boy Ric Flair, "To be THE MAN, you've got to BEAT THE MAN!!" Whether you like him or not, Floyd "Money" Mayweather is the best thing going today and I don't see that changing anytime soon.

Chad Dawson dethrones Bernard Hopkins: Did Father Time Finally Catch Up To The Executioner?

By Ronald "RC" Cameron

About 4 years ago, current pound for pound king Floyd Mayweather (who was retired at the time) told several boxing reporters that "Bad" Chad Dawson was the best fighter in the sport. And while Dawson has had some impressive wins along the way, beating former Light-Heavyweight champions Glen Johnson and Antonio Tarver twice, nothing compares to what Dawson accomplished Saturday night as he dethroned WBC Light-Heavyweight king and future Hall of Fame legend Bernard Hopkins, winning a workman-like majority decision over the cagey veteran.

Dawson kept his composure, as he fought most of the fight with a badly cut left eye (due to an "accidental" head butt) and he dominated the fight by out-working and at times man-handing the champion, beating him at his own game. This was not a crowd pleasing fight, but Dawson stuck with his game-plan and was clearly the aggressor for most of the fight. Dawson was effective when he took the fight to Hopkins, landing several clean left leads and some good uppercuts when they fought in close.

As for Hopkins, he had his moments, but not enough of them. He did not go the body with any sort of consistency and he was not as accurate as usual. He did manage to land some solid right hands but he rarely followed up with anything else. It was mostly one punch at a time for Hopkins and when he did occasionally throw more than one punch, Dawson blocked them and counter-punched well. Not since his loss to Roy Jones in 1993 have we seen Hopkins clearly dominated in a fight.

And I hate to bring this up, but this can't be avoided—while two judges scored the fight 117-111 (I scored it the same way) judge Luis Rivera scored this fight a draw (114-114).  I've said it before and I will say it again—judges and referees should be interviewed (and possibly drug-tested) right after each fight, especially when there are questionable scorecards or bad judgement calls by referees.  It's getting to the point to where I'm not surprised when I see a terrible scorecard, I now EXPECT to see it and I'm shocked when I don't see at least one bad scorecard when a decision is announced. And until someone investigates these judges and referees, I will continue to expect the worst when it comes to most judges and referees.

After the fight, Hopkins refused to give an interview in the ring, but Dawson had a lot to say. The new champion said the he wants to face Super-Middleweight king, Andre "S.O.G." Ward next and he would be willing to move down to 168lbs to fight him. Ward responded on his twitter account saying, "Why is my twitter blowing up?  Y'all know how the game goes. We can get it done!" It's a fight I would love to see take place at some point, but not before Dawson seeks revenge against former Light-Heavyweight champion Jean Pascal. I know Pascal was exposed against Hopkins but styles makes fights and Pascal's awkward style did pose some problems for Dawson and maybe he could do the same if they fought again, who knows.

As for Hopkins, he has nothing left to prove.  I know there are a lot of boxing fans out there who despise the man and are happy that he lost this fight, but no one can take away the fact that he's a first ballot Hall of Fame fighter who has done some amazing things during his career.  And with the possible exception of Archie Moore, NO fighter has accomplished more after the age of 40 than the Executioner. Hopkins was clearly out-worked tonight, but my question to boxing fans is simply this: Did "Father Time" finally catch up to the 47 year old Hopkins, or is Chad Dawson just that good?  I believe it's a combination of both, but I give the majority of the credit to Dawson, who fought Hopkins similar to how Joe Calzaghe fought him 4 years ago, but Dawson was more effective and more aggressive.

Have we seen the last of Bernard Hopkins? Who knows? If this is the end for him, whether you like him or not, Bernard Hopkins did things HIS way and when he does decide to retire, Hopkins will end his career on his own terms. Let's just hope that he makes the right decision before it's too late. Far too often, fighters stay around too long and suffer terrible beatings late in their careers and they pay for it physically and mentally later on. Hopkins has had 60 pro fights, yet he's never really took a beating in any of his fights and I for one hopes it stays that way.

Bernard Hopkins vs Chad Dawson II Preview: Will This Be A Retirement Party Or Will The Professor School The Student?

By Ronald "RC" Cameron

In this day and age, most elite fighters seem to be more interested in low risk, high reward fights. Back in the late 1970's, the Light-Heavyweight division was filled with elite, Hall of Fame caliber fighters.  Guys like Mathew Saad Muhammad, Eddie Mustafa Muhammad, Victor Galindez, Marvin Johnson and others all fought each other and sometimes they fought on the same card. The Light Heavyweight division will never be as competitive as it was back in the late 1970's but this Saturday night in Atlantic City, Light Heavyweight champion and former Undisputed Middleweight king Bernard "The Executioner" Hopkins, at the ripe age of 47, will once again take on challenger and former Light-Heavyweight champ, "Bad" Chad Dawson.

The two faced each other last October and the fight ended in major controversy.  Near the end of the second round Dawson and Hopkins got tangled up and Dawson threw Hopkins off of him which resulted in Hopkins falling to the canvas and landing awkwardly on his shoulder. Hopkins was in obvious pain after the fall and the referee asked Hopkins if he could continue and Hopkins replied, "With one arm, yes!"  The referee decided that Hopkins could not continue with one arm, so he stopped the fight and awarded the fight and the title to Dawson, which caused a lot of drama and outrage from boxing fans. After the fight, Dawson accused Hopkins of faking his injury, stating that Hopkins was looking for a way out while Hopkins insisted that he was hurt and he even referenced another incident where he was pushed down in another fight (the Antwun Echols rematch in 2000) and he injured his shoulder, but he continued fighting and stopped Echols in the 10th round.  Hopkins filed a protest, stating the fight should be ruled a no-contest thus making their fight null and void which would give Hopkins his title back. A month later, the WBC did the right thing (for once) and declared their first fight a technical draw and reinstated Hopkins as the WBC champion.

One more thing that needs to be mentioned before I continue with this preview--early in the second round, Hopkins caught Dawson with a short, counter right hand which caused Dawson to lose his balance and his glove clearly touched the canvas and that should have been ruled a knockdown. Referee Pat Russell made two terrible mistakes in this fight-- missing the knockdown and of course, not explaining to Hopkins that if he did not continue fighting with his injury, he would lose this fight.

So why should people be interested in this rematch? For me, I'm always interested when Bernard Hopkins fights. I know his style isn't for everyone; he's a defensive guru and he knows every dirty trick in the book, but Hopkins is also a survivor who's at his best when he's considered the underdog. Many boxing experts thought that Felix Trinidad would beat him 11 years ago and Hopkins annihilated him, few people gave Hopkins a chance against Kelly Pavlik a few years ago and Hopkins exposed him and last year and there were some who thought that Jean Pascal had Bernard's number and Hopkins took him to school in their rematch.  It's usually not a wise choice to bet against the Satchel Paige of boxing.

As for Chad Dawson, he has a wealth of boxing talent, and not for that unfortunate cut in his fight with Pascal, I thought Dawson was on the verge of stopping Pascal late in the fight. When Chad is focused, he's one of the best fighters in the sport. He whipped Thomas Adamek and he defeated  former champions Glen Johnson and Antonio Tarver twice, so he's familiar with fighting crafty veterans. And throw in the fact that these two don't like each other and they both feel that they have something to prove to each other, to me that's the perfect formula for a good fight.


Keys To The Fight




Chad Dawson

• Out-work Hopkins: The one knock on Dawson is that he doesn't always fight aggressively, especially late in fights.  He must out-work the crafty champion in the same manner as fellow southpaw Joe Calzaghe did 4 years ago. 

• Go to the body early and often: Hopkins always comes into his fights in excellent condition and he always fights well in the later rounds, but most guys who fought Hopkins did not throw body shots early in the fight. If Dawson goes to the body early and sticks with it through the course of the fight, this could pay dividends for the challenger if the fight goes into the championship rounds. 

• Stick to your game-plan: Dawson cannot afford getting caught up into a street brawl with Hopkins. We all know that Hopkins can fight that way if he needs to and Dawson has already shown that he can lose his cool. If he sticks to his game-plan, Dawson's hand speed and youth could pose some major problems for the champion. 

Bernard Hopkins

• Be a counter-puncher: As I mentioned earlier, Hopkins had some success in their first fight by counter-punching, especially with lead right hands, which work well with southpaws.  Hopkins knows he can hurt Dawson with that shot, so he needs to stick with what works.

• Keep the fight in the center of the ring: Hopkins can adapt to any style, but he has had some problems when he's been forced to fight off of the ropes. Hopkins is at his best when he's methodically moving around the ring, surveying his opponent and when he sees an opening, he attacks. Hopkins is no spring chicken, so moving around the ring may not be the wise thing to do for 12 full rounds, but he can't allow Dawson to trap him along the ropes and out-work him.

• Play a few "mind games" with Dawson: This is something that Hopkins is famous for doing in most of his fights. I'm not saying he should do something illegal (He's famous for that as well), what I'm suggesting is for Hopkins to do something that will irritate Dawson and get him to deviate away from his game-plan. I'm not going to suggest anything for Hopkins to do because I'm sure if Hopkins plans on doing something along those lines, he will come up with something creative because he's done it so many times in the past. 

RC's Prediction

This is a tough fight to predict because there are several questions that needs to be answered going into this bout. Can Dawson maintain his game-plan for 12 rounds? Will Hopkins turn this fight into a brawl and if so, who does that favor?  Will Father Time finally show up and rain on Bernard's parade?  To me, this fight will be come down to which fighter is in better condition and who has more discipline.  As we saw in their brief battle last year, I think we will seen a chess match early on. Hopkins will have some success landing counter right hands and Dawson will be effective when he forces Hopkins to fight going backwards. But once this fight starts to heat up in the later rounds, I believe Hopkins will gradually take the fight over by turning this fight into a war and taking advantage of Dawson's mistakes. Dawson will have his moments, but in the end, Hopkins will out-smart Dawson and win a hard-fought majority decision over Dawson. 

Leonard vs Hagler: 25 Years Have Passed, But The Debate Lingers On

By Ronald "RC" Cameron

April 6th, 1987 was supposed to be a massacre. Very few boxing experts believed this fight would unfold any other way and there were plenty of reasons why people believed that to be the case. On one side of the ring was the Undisputed Middleweight Champion, Marvin Hagler--who was considered by many as the best fighter in the world who had not lost a fight in 11 years. Some boxing experts also believed Hagler was one of the best Middleweight champions of all time and the greatest southpaw that ever laced them up.

And waiting for him in the opposite corner was former Undisputed Welterweight king Sugar Ray Leonard-- who only fought once in 5 years and when we last saw him, he did not look anything like the Leonard who dominated the Welterweight division a few years earlier. Many boxing fans had been anticipating this showdown for over 5 years and finally the boxing world would finally get to see the dream matchup they had been waiting for. But before the two faced each other, both fighters had to go through some trials and tribulations along the way.

After turning pro in 1973, Hagler went on to win his first 17 fights before fighting to a disputed draw against the 1972 Olympic Gold Medal winner "Sugar Ray" Seales, a draw that Hagler would avenge several years later.  Hagler would suffer two setbacks in 1976, losing close decisions to Bobby Watts and Willie Monroe. Both of those fights were fought in Philadelphia, which happened to by the hometown of both Watts and Monroe, so you can draw your own conclusion. But just as he did against Seales, the skilled southpaw atoned for his two losses, knocking out Monroe (twice) and Watts in their rematches a few years later.

After being avoided by champions for many years and compiling a record of 47-2-1, Marvin finally received his first title shot against then-Middleweight king Vito Antuofermo in 1979 and the two fought to a controversial draw( On the same night Leonard fought Wifred Benitez). A year later, Hagler earned another crack at the Middleweight title, this time against Englishman Alan Minter, who dethroned Antuofermo a year earlier. Just as he was forced to do early in his career, Hagler traveled into hostile territory and fought in his opponent's hometown. Before the fight took place, Minter made an unfortunate racial comment, stating that "No black man would take my title!" Hagler didn't need any more motivation going into this fight, but that statement added more fuel to the fire.  With his second crack at the Middleweight crown, Hagler would make the most of his opportunity as he annihilated Minter, destroying him in three, one sided rounds. But unfortunately for Hagler, he was unable to celebrate his big win inside of the ring because several irate fans threw beer bottles and debris into the ring towards the new champion and he had to be escorted out of the area.

Hagler was a fighting champion, as he dismantled former champion Vito Antuofermo in their rematch, he whipped  top contender Mustafa Hamsho twice, he barely got past the legendary Roberto Duran but a year later he chopped down Thomas "The Hitman" Hearns in three of the most brutal rounds in Middleweight boxing history. Hagler proved to the world that he was one of the greatest Middleweight champions of all time by taking on all comers, yet there was one man left that he so desperately wanted to face before calling it a career--Former Undisputed Welterweight king Sugar Ray Leonard.

Unlike Hagler, Leonard traveled a different road to get to the top. After winning the 1976 Light Welterweight Olympic Gold Medal, Leonard was unsure about turning pro because his hands were in bad shape, but he reconsidered when his parents had some unfortunate health issues that required immediate attention. So in order to earn money to help with his family's medical bills, Leonard decided to turn pro.  But before he made his official decision, he received some advice from a man he idolized-- Muhammad Ali. Sitting in his dressing room right before his third fight with Ken Norton in NY, Ali advised Leonard by telling him, "If you do turn pro, just make sure you don't do what I did. Don't let anyone own you. Remember, you are the one in the ring and most of the money you earn should belong to you!"  And Ali also suggested that if he does turn pro, he should hire his hall of fame trainer, Angelo Dundee. Leonard took his advice, hired Dundee and instead of signing a deal with promoter Don King or Bob Arum, Leonard hired lawyer Mike Trainer to handle his business and promotional affairs, but Leonard was his own boss and he called his own shots. 

After compiling a 25-0 record, Leonard would finally receive his shot at the WBC Welterweight crown, but he had to face the young counter-punching wizard, Wilfred Benitez on November 30, 1979. This was a fast-paced chess match, but Leonard's power and blazing hand speed proved to be the difference in this fight. Leonard went on to stop Benitez in the final seconds of the 15th round, winning his first world title. After anesthetizing Davey Boy Green in his first title defense, Leonard would battle the former Lightweight king and future hall of fame great, Roberto Duran. Before the fight, Duran made some crude comments about Leonard's wife and this infuriated him. Instead of trying to out-box him, Leonard decided that he was going to stand toe to toe with the Hands of Stone and try to knock him out. In a fight that was fought mostly in close quarters, Duran out-worked Leonard and won a razor-thin decision over Leonard, taking his WBC Welterweight title in the process.

The two would meet again 5 months later but this time around, Leonard would fight HIS fight.  Leonard out-boxed the champion by using a stiff left jab and scoring with accurate counter right hands and uppercuts when Duran tried to attack him. After being embarrassed for most of the fight, in the 8th round Duran shocked the boxing world by turning his back to Leonard and waving him off as if to say that he didn't want to fight any longer. After some confusion, it was now clear to everyone-- Roberto Duran quit. Leonard regained his WBC Welterweight title that night and this was a great accomplishment, but there was another man who held a portion of the Welterweight crown and that man was undefeated WBA Welterweight kingpin, Thomas "The Hitman" Hearns.

On September 16th, 1981, in a fight that what was billed as "The Showdown", Leonard and Hearns put their WBC and WBA belts on the line and battled in what proved to be the greatest Welterweight fight of all time. With his left eye swollen shut and behind on the scorecards, Leonard rallied to knock Hearns down in the 13th and he closed the show by stopping Hearns in the 14th, thus being declared the undisputed Welterweight king.

After beating Hearns, Sugar Ray Leonard was now on top of the boxing world, as he replaced the now- retired Muhammad Ali as the new face of the sport, but he now faced another obstacle that put his boxing career in major jeopardy. When training for a title defense against Roger Stafford, Leonard started to notice spots out of his left eye and his visibility started to become less clear to him when seeing out of that eye. Leonard went to see a specialist and he was diagnosed with a detached retina. Leonard had no choice but to cancel the Stafford fight and have surgery on his eye. After a successful surgery, Leonard was faced with a tough decision-- risk further damaging his eye by continuing to fight, or retire. Leonard was financially secure, but there was one potential mega-fight that fans really wanted to see-- Sugar Ray Leonard vs. Marvelous Marvin Hagler.

Leonard considered all of the possibilities after his surgery and he mulled everything over during the summer. He decided to make a formal announcement on his future plans on November 9, 1982. Ray invited his family and friends (including Hagler) and most people expected Leonard to announce that he was ready to move up and face the Middleweight king but to their surprise, Leonard announced his retirement.  Hagler was not too pleased about being tricked but he told reporters that eventually Leonard would come back.

And just as Hagler predicted, Leonard could not stay away from boxing and he returned in 1984 to face a relatively unknown contender named Kevin Howard. Leonard suffered his first knockdown in his career and did not look great, but he recovered and stopped Howard in the 9th round. Leonard retired again right after that fight and continued to work as a boxing analyst for CBS and HBO and when he wasn't commentating, he would often attend major fights. Leonard may have been retired at that time, but he still loved boxing and he still had some unfinished business to deal with.

On March 10th, 1986, Hagler faced the undefeated knockout artist, John "The Beast" Mugabi and sure enough, Leonard was at ringside watching this fight. This was a brutal battle; Hagler took a lot of punishment from Mugabi and at times looked like he was a step slower than usual.  But despite absorbing some enormous bombs from Mugabi, the champion shook them off like rainwater and responded in kind. Hagler wore the challenger down in the later rounds and stopped him in the 11th round, but after watching Hagler struggle with Mugabi,  Leonard felt that now was the time to challenge the undisputed Middleweight king.

But this time it was Hagler who had leverage and he did not forget how Leonard embarrassed him years earlier so he decided to make Leonard wait a while before he made his decision. After stalling for a few months, Hagler finally agreed to face Leonard in what was billed as "The Super Fight." Hagler was so confident that he was going to win, when Leonard requested a bigger ring and for the fight to be scheduled for 12 rounds instead of 15, Hagler agreed to everything.

Not only was Hagler confident, most boxing experts did not give Leonard a chance of surviving 12 rounds with Hagler, let alone winning the fight. How could a guy who only fought once in 5 years be competitive with a guy who hasn't lost a fight in 11 years?

On April 6th 1987, the two would finally face each other to settle this one and for all.  In the first round, Leonard moved around the ring laterally and to his surprise, Hagler came out fighting right-handed instead of southpaw. Midway through the round, Leonard caught Hagler with a solid left hook that got his attention. There were not a lot of punches thrown in this round, but Leonard beat him to the punch when they did exchange and he won the round. For the next three rounds, Leonard continued to move and jab and at times he would get the best of Hagler when they stood toe to toe. The champion did switch back to fighting southpaw in the third round and was clearly the aggressor but he was not effective while being aggressive.

But Hagler stepped it up in the 5th round as he focused on going to the body and near the end of the round, he hurt Leonard with a short right uppercut. Leonard did recover, but the champion did enough to win the first round on my scorecard.

Both guys landed some good shots in the 6th round but Leonard's counter punching and accuracy did enough to pull it out. Leonard was clearly winning the fight at this point, but he was starting to show some signs of fatigue.

The champion responded by winning the next two rounds, as he continued to reach Leonard with his right jab and some good body shots when they fought in close quarters.  Leonard was searching to find his second wind and Hagler was taking advantage of it. Leonard had his moments in rounds 7 and 8, but Hagler was the busier, more effective fighter.

Midway through the 9th round, Marvin rocked Leonard with a short left hand, which was by far the best punch of the fight. Hagler applied constant pressure as he tried to end the fight right there and he scored with several hard shots while Leonard was on the ropes, but out of nowhere, Leonard reminded the world that underneath that million dollar smile lies a warrior who refuses to quit. Just as it appeared as if the challenger was on the verge of being knocked down, Leonard fought Hagler off by throwing a flurry of punches that forced Hagler to momentarily stop moving forward. Leonard landed some good counter shots after that but Hagler continued to apply non-stop effective pressure and he clearly won this round.

If there was a round that could have been scored even, it was the 10th. Both guys landed some clean shots but I gave the slight nod to Hagler because he landed the harder shots and he closed the round strong.

The 11th round was Leonard's best round of the fight. The challenger scored repeatedly with right hands and short left hooks and while Hagler pursued Leonard, he could not land any clean shots on him. The Middleweight champ looked frustrated as the round ended, while Leonard was very confident, as if he knew he had the champion right where he wanted him.

In the final round, Leonard, who thought he had the fight in the bag, taunted Hagler while the champion made the mistake of trying to showboat with him. This was also a close round to score as neither guy threw a lot of punches, but Leonard landed the cleaner shots and he did enough to win it.

Soon after the bell sounded to end the fight, Leonard was carried to his corner by two of his corner men and what really shocked me was seeing Hagler dancing, which seemed out of character for him.

As we all know, Leonard dethroned Hagler, winning a controversial split decision. I scored the fight 115-113 for Sugar Ray and I have no problem with anyone who believes that Hagler won by the same score, but there is one thing that needs to be mentioned-- Judge Jose Guerra, who scored this fight 118-110 should have been fired on the spot. If there was any controversy in this fight, it had to do with that corrupt scorecard Guerra filled out. This was a close fight, but to call this fight a robbery is laughable to me.

Sugar Ray Leonard--who had only fought once in 5 years, moved up in weight and upset the best fighter in the world who was arguably the greatest southpaw of all time. He never hurt the champion, but his defense, his accuracy and how he counter-punched Hagler when they did fight toe to toe won the fight for him.  Hagler didn't do himself any favors by starting slow and fighting right handed instead of southpaw early in the fight. He was clearly the aggressor and at times he did land some good shots, but as I mentioned earlier, he was not always effective when he was aggressive. Hagler missed a lot of shots and he did look slow and tired late in the fight.

There was some talk of a rematch between these two and Leonard had no problem giving Hagler one, but Hagler decided to hang up his gloves for good. I always wondered why Hagler, who took this loss hard and believed that he beat Leonard, did not want to face him again to avenge his loss. He lost two other times in his career and he avenged both of those losses, so why not do it again? Nevertheless, Hagler retired and unlike many other fighters, he actually stayed retired for good.

As for Leonard, he continued to fight for a few more years. He was lucky to walk away with a draw with Thomas Hearns in their rematch (To his credit, Leonard admitted to Hearns on national television that he lost that fight) and he beat Duran again, but as is the case with so many great fighters near the end of their careers, legends die hard. Leonard lost his last two fights, losing to future hall of fame Jr. Middleweight king Terry Norris via a lopsided 12 round decision and was stopped by Hector Camacho in 5 rounds before finally retiring for good at the age of 40.
.

For many years after their showdown, Hagler remained very bitter about their fight but last year at a WBC convention, Hagler and Leonard finally talked and buried the hatchet. I don't believe that Leonard ever harbored any bad feelings towards Hagler, but it was good to see that Hagler finally put it all behind him.

I've read some reports that Leonard, Hagler, Hearns (who will be inducted this year) and Duran will all be in attendance at the IBHOF (International Boxing Hall of Fame) this year and that's GREAT news. I have a suggestion for them--How about putting together an autobiography/movie with all of those fighters? Remember the movie "Champion's Forever", where Muhammad Ali, Larry Holmes, Joe Frazier, George Foreman and Ken Norton all got together and talked about their battles against each other? Leonard, Hagler, Hearns and Duran could all get together at the IBHOF and make it happen.

And also, why not add Wilfred Benitez to the mix? Sadly, he's in no condition to travel but he's faced all of the guys I mentioned except for Hagler. And I have one last suggestion-- They could all donate a portion of the proceeds to Wilfred's family so he can pay for his medical bills and help him moving forward. Just a thought.

One thing is for sure, when those guys do get together, whether it's at the IBHOF or somewhere else, they will not end their conversation without discussing the "Super Fight" between Marvelous Marvin Hagler and Sugar Ray Leonard. Many fans thought this fight was controversial, some believed Hagler got robbed, but in my opinion the right guy won this fight. Let the debate continue!!

Orlando Salido Man-Handles Juan Manuel Lopez In 10

By Ronald "RC" Cameron

For many years, it has always has been said in boxing that styles makes fights and tonight was no different.  The reigning WBO Featherweight champion Orlando Salido proved once again that he is too much for Juan Manuel Lopez as he went into his backyard and stopped Lopez in the 10th round in a very good fight. 

As he did in their first fight, Salido took the fight right to the Puerto Rican sensation and applied constant pressure, landing looping over-hand rights and left hooks that Lopez did not have an answer for. Salido easily won the first 4 rounds and Lopez looked shaky and unsure of himself early on. But late in the 5th round, Lopez caught champion with a hard counter-right hook that dropped him. Salido did make it to his feet and luckily for him, the round was over.

Salido recovered from that knockdown and he out-worked Lopez and he won the next 3 rounds by landing the harder, cleaner shots. Lopez had his moments, but he could not put together more than once punch at a time. The 9th round was one of the best rounds in recent memory as the two took turns thrashing each other. At the end of the 9th round, Salido's eyes were both swollen, but it was Lopez who looked like he was out of gas and defeated.

In the 10th round, the Mexican warrior stepped it up and midway through the round he hurt the challenger with a solid right hand and he landed another hard right hand that sent the challenger to the canvas. Lopez got up but his legs were shaky and his eyes were glossy. The referee took a good look at him, asked him if he could continue, but Lopez was still unsteady so the referee had no choice but to stop the fight. A good stoppage in my opinion because Lopez had nothing left and he needed a miracle to win at that point.  Orlando Salido once again went into the lion's den and came out of it unscathed.

Now I said earlier that Lopez needed a miracle to win the fight after the 10th round, but did he? At the end of the 9th round, two judges had the fight scored 86-84 for Lopez and one judge had the fight scored even.  

Now I know this might sound like nit-picking, but far too often, great fights have been over-shadowed by terrible referees and in this case, lousy judges. Those three judges should be investigated for their lackluster performance tonight. I had the fight scored 88-82 at the time of the stoppage and I even gave Lopez a 10-8 round in the 5th when I could have easily scored it 10-9 because Salido was winning the round before the knockdown.

And to top it off, after the fight Lopez complained about the stoppage, saying that he stopped the fight too soon.  Lopez also said that he thought that he thought he was winning the fight before the fight was stopped. I respect Lopez, he's a good fighter who showed tremendous heart but if he thinks he was winning the fight, he should go get his head examined.  This fight was not close.

So where do both fighters go from here? For Salido, I'd like to see him fight Chris John, or even Miguel Angel "Mikey" Garcia. Either way, when Salido fights again, I will be tuning in because he's an exiting fighter with a non-stop motor.  

As for Lopez, I believe he needs to think about changing trainers. No disrespect to his current trainer, but I did not see any improvement in Lopez in this fight. Maybe it's just a case of Salido just having his number, but Lopez looked timid and unsteady early in the fight and he never adjusted to Salido's constant pressure and could not avoid his over-hand rights and left hooks. Lopez should consider seeking out a defensive wizard, someone who knows how to fight southpaw and teach Lopez how to avoid a right hand. Why not acquire the services of the GREAT Pernell Whitaker?  In any case, Lopez needs to work on his defense.

But still this was a very good fight, considering the battle was somewhat one-sided. And thanks to Orlando Salido closing the show in the 10th round, this fight was taken out of the judge's dirty hands.

Banning Dereck Chisora Proved Once Again That The WBC Is A Joke

By Ronald Cameron

"Money talks and bullshit runs a marathon!" - Drug kingpin Nino Brown, from the movie New Jack City.  

This is what Nino Brown told that helpless guy who was hanging upside down by his feet by one of Nino's goons on a bridge in the classic movie, New Jack City. While Heavyweight contender Dereck Chisora is not fighting for his life, he was banned indefinitely by the WBC this past Tuesday for slapping WBC Heavyweight Champion, Vitali Klitschko before their fight and for getting into an altercation with former Heavyweight title holder David Haye a few hours after coming up short in his WBC title fight with Vitali.  While there is no doubt that Chisora was clearly out of line for attacking Haye in that manner, I have a HUGE problem with this suspension and I have a theory as to why Chisora was suspended by the WBC. 


First let's start with the suspension. I'm not going to go into great detail about the incident with Vitali because it was just a slap. Vitali settled things in the ring, so there is really nothing to discuss. But the incident with David Haye was a bit more serious.  Chisora did confront Haye, but Haye did throw and land a  punch and Haye was not suspended. In my opinion, the reason why David Haye was not suspended as opposed to Chisora is because Haye is a PPV draw and Chisora could not draw flies to feces. Does anyone remember when Mike Tyson attacked Lennox Lewis before their big fight and bit him on his leg? Did Mike Tyson get suspended for that? Exactly.  


I'll give you 2 more examples and I will compare them both: Before his fight with Shane Mosley, Antonio Margarito got busted for trying to put illegal hand wraps on. Margarito was suspended for a year, but he has since been reinstated and he has fought in 2 PPV fights.  About 30 years ago, a similar incident occurred when journeyman Luis Resto took on undefeated contender Billy Collins. Resto gave Collins a severe beating, winning a 10 round decision but after the fight, Collins father and trainer Billy Sr. discovered that Resto's gloves felt thin and he demanded that the New York State Athletic Commission impound those gloves. The Commission did investigate this and they discovered that someone (Resto's trainer Panama Lewis) removed an ounce of padding in both gloves.


Sadly, Collins suffered permanent blurred vision from the injuries he sustained in that fight and he died a few months later in a car accident.  As for Resto and Lewis, both were eventually banned  from boxing for life and they were both found guilty of assault and conspiracy and both of them did some time in prison for their actions. For more information on this incident, I strongly suggest you watch the HBO special, "Assault in the Ring."  


The point I'm trying to make is that Luis Resto was a journeyman, who did not draw any money and he was banned for life for his actions and Margarito, even though they busted him before his fight with Mosley, the intent was there and he was only banned for a year and I strongly believe that the reason why he was allowed to fight again is because Margarito is a PPV draw who could in turn make money for the WBC and other boxing organizations. Money talks and BS runs a marathon.

Now let's get back to Dereck Chisora's incident. As I mentioned, Chisora is not a PPV draw, so it was like water under a bridge for the WBC to suspend him indefinitely because he's not someone who will put butts in the seats which would in turn put money in their pockets. There have been so many incidents that took place outside of the ring with fighters over the years and most of them did not result in any suspensions in part because most of the guys who got into those altercations were fighters who could draw money.  There is only one man I blame for this and that's the WBC President Jose Sulaiman.  I'm going to refrain from taking shots at him (Although I could write several articles just on some of the terrible decisions he has made over the years) but I will just say that  the WBC has been anything but respectable for many years and most of that has to do with him.

Dereck Chisora should have been fined for his actions a couple of weeks ago, but not suspended indefinitely.  I'm going to leave you all with this question: Do you think that the WBC would have suspended Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. if he did the exact same thing that Chisora did?  Money talks and .......you know the rest.  

The NFL Hall of Fame Voting Process Needs To Be Changed

By Ronald "RC" Cameron

Before I begin, I believe that the NFL is the best team sport in the world, even better than the NBA (And I LOVE the NBA) and for the most part, they do a great job of promoting their sport and making it better every year. But there is one thing that the NFL clearly can't seem to get right and that's the HOF (Hall of Fame) voting process. Currently, there are 44 voters, most of which never picked up a football in their lives and they meet every year and decide the fate of potential HOF candidates.

I have a HUGE problem with the HOF voting process and for many reasons.   As I mentioned earlier, most of the voters are sportswriters and  every year they all meet for 8-9 hours and determine who belongs into the Hall of Fame.

Also, there are NO HOF players or coaches that have a vote. Who would better determine who deserves to be in the Hall of Fame better than someone who owns the prestigious tan jacket?

And why is the process so private? If those 44 voters have a vote, they should be able to tell the world who they voted for and those players who were denied would then have the right to respond to them, voicing their displeasure.

And one last thing--I know HOF voters say that they don't consider what players have done off the field and they say that they don't hold grudges against players or coaches who have been less than "media friendly", but how do they explain why so many guys who were not always nice to the media get passed over every year? I'm going to list three guys who should have been voted into the Hall of Fame on the first ballot. I'm not going to reveal their names right away, just their stats and accomplishments.


1.  When he retired, this wide receiver was second all-time in receptions (1101) and in touchdowns (130), he went to 8 straight Pro Bowls in an era filled with elite wide receivers (Jerry Rice, Michael Irvin, Sterling Sharpe, Randy Moss, Terrell Owens). He was a leader on the field and no wide receiver in the history of the NFL had a better set of hands.

2. This Defensive end played 12 seasons, he recorded 100.5 sacks, he was a 5 time Pro-bowler and he is the only player in NFL history who was on 5 Super Bowl teams.

3. This coach won 2 Super Bowls and led another team to another one. His assistant coaches went on to win a plethora of Super Bowls (Bill Belichick, Tom Coughlin, Sean Payton) and he has rebuilt several failing franchises. 

Before I reveal those three guys, I have to ask one question: Based on their stats and accomplishments, did you consider them to be Hall of Fame worthy? The three guys I'm talking about are Cris Carter, Charles Haley and of course "The Big Tuna", Bill Parcells.

The Hall of Fame snub that has me in an up roar is Cris Carter, who has been denied for the last 5 years. Full disclosure: I'm a life-long Minnesota Viking fan and a fan of Carter's so I will admit I may have a blind spot where Carter is concerned, but still I believe he's being denied his rightful place into the Hall of Fame because as I stated, he was not always media friendly when he played.

Most NFL sports fans know about some of things Charles Haley was accused of doing in locker rooms and to those that don't know, Google his name.  And also, Bill Parcells was known for being somewhat abrasive to the media and I'm sure most of those sportswriters haven't forgotten how he treated some of them. Still, that should not prevent those guys from being entered into the Hall of Fame.

And since the Hall of Fame voters seem to be biased against players or coaches who did not grant those interviews or who berated them during interviews, I believe the voting process should be altered and expanded.



Here is my solution for improving the Hall of Fame voting process:

1. Given there are 32 teams in the NFL, give three Hall of Fame votes to three current Hall of Famers who played for those respective teams. For example, in Dallas, give a vote to Emmitt Smith, Michael Irvin and Roger Staubach (or Troy Aikman). And if a team doesn't have anyone who's in the Hall of Fame,  give those votes to teams that have a large amount of Hall of Famers like Pittsburgh or San Francisco.

2. Make the HOF voting process public for all to see or just mail in the votes and add them up. It should not take 45 voters eight hours to decide on whether or not a guy should be inducted into the Hall of Fame. Either you're a Hall of Famer, or you're not. Simple as that. 

3. Expand the number of modern day players/coaches from 5 to 8.  I know I mentioned Cris Carter as someone who has been snubbed, but there are other deserving players such as Jerome Bettis, Tim Brown, Andre Reed and many others. Expanding that number to 8 would help get those guys into the Hall of Fame. 

So there you have it. If you agree with my solution, or if you think the current voting process is fine, I want to  hear from you. 

RC's Greatest Light Heavyweights of All Time Part 2

By Ronald "RC" Cameron






Here is Part 2 of my top 5 Greatest Light Heavyweights of All Time article.  I hope you enjoy it.



3.  Gene Tunney











Professional Record: (According to Boxrec) 65-1-1 with 48 KO's


Credentials: He was almost unbeatable as a Light Heavyweight and he fought and beat several Hall of Fame caliber fighters.


Biggest wins: (As a Light Heavyweight) Battling Levinsky (UD 12) Harry Greb (UD 15) Georges Carpentier (TKO 15)


Now before I go on, I've only seen Tunney fight only a handful of times, but I've done my research on him and based on what he accomplished as a Light Heavyweight, he could have easily been ranked at the top of this list.  Gene Tunney was a smooth boxer, who used lateral movement, an accurate jab, good right hand and he was a decent counter-puncher.  He was a true technician who was also not afraid to mix it up with his opponents.

Born in New York, Tunney learned how to fight by getting into street fights when he was a young kid. He discovered boxing when he was in his teens and he turned pro in 1915 and he stopped Bobby Dawson in the 8th round.

After winning his first 36 fights, Tunney faced his first true test against future Hall of Famer, Battling Levinsky.  Tunney passed this test with flying colors, as he outpointed Levinsky over 12 rounds.

A few months later, Tunney took on the dangerous buzz saw, Harry Greb.  Tunney fought well early on, but as the fight progressed, Greb turned the fight into a pier six brawl, using his elbows and head as weapons, and Tunney sustained cuts over his eyes and his nose and mouth were also bleeding. Greb outworked Tunney in the late rounds and he won a hard-fought unanimous decision over Tunney.

Despite taking a vicious beating from Greb, Tunney wanted desperately to avenge his only defeat, but he also understood that he had to come up with a different strategy against the "Human Windmill" if he wanted to come out on top.  The two would face each other a year later and this fight was much different than their first encounter.

Instead of mixing it up with Greb as he did in their first fight, Tunney counter-punched him and tried to beat him to the punch. Greb was as dangerous as always, applying constant pressure every second of every round, but he could not inflict the same damage to Tunney as he did in their first fight.  Tunney won a controversial split decision over Greb and he avenged his only loss in his career. The two legends would fight 3 more times and Tunney got the upper hand, going 2-0-1 against Greb.

Tunney has also defeated other great fighters, such as Georges Carpentier (TKO 15) and Tommy Gibbons (KO 12).  And just as Michael Spinks did many years later, Tunney moved from the Light Heavyweight division and won the World Heavyweight title, defeating a Hall of Fame Champion (Jack Dempsey). Tunney never won the official Light Heavyweight title, but he defeated several former and future World champions when he was fighting in that division.  Tunney did not duck anyone in his entire career and he was a true champion inside and outside of the ring.





2. Archie Moore "The Old Mongoose"















Professional Record: *185-23-10 with 131 Knockouts *(According to Boxrec.com)


Credentials: Holds the record for most knockouts in a career, he fought 7 Hall of Famers and fought many of them more than once.


Biggest wins: Jimmy Bivins (KO 8) Joey Maxim (UD 15) Harold Johnson (TKO 14) Yvon Durelle (KO 11)


He might have been the greatest puncher in boxing history. He ruled the Light-Heavyweight division longer than anyone before him or since and didn't duck a soul. I could only be talking about Archibald Lee Wright,  better known as "The Old Mongoose", Archie Moore.

Born on December 13th, 1916(according to Archie) in Benoit, Mississippi, Moore was a kid who often could not escape trouble and when he was a teen, he ended up being sent to an reformatory. After being released in 1934, Moore discovered boxing and turned pro a couple of years later.

Now before I go on, there are a few things you need to know about Archie Moore's career and his birth date. First off, there are so many different versions of when Archie Moore started boxing professionally. There are some people who say he fought under an assumed name for a couple of years ("The Fourth of July Kid) and then you have boxrec.com who say that Archie turned pro in 1935. No one really knows for sure, but for the purpose of writing this article, boxrec.com is where I got my information and I'm going to ride with that.

Then you have the issue with his age. According to Archie, he was born on December 13th, 1916, but there are others who said that he was born on the same day, but in 1913. Fellow Hall of Famer, Sonny Liston had this same problem years later, so this is nothing new.

Nevertheless, Moore started boxing professionally in the mid-1930's, and for the next 5 years, he fought mostly as a Middleweight, fighting all around the US and he also toured in Australia. Along the way he suffered a few setbacks, but for the most part Moore was developing into a solid fighter who was capable of knocking guys out with either hand. He was also a very good counter-puncher and his crab-like defense made it tough for his foes to land a solid shot on him. 

After a brief retirement in 1941 due to stomach ulcers, Moore returned the following year and continued to fight often. Over the next 3 years, he took on future Hall of Famers Charley Burley and Jimmy Bivins. Moore lost to both of them, but he gained more experience and exposure in the process. 

In 1946, Moore moved up to the Light-Heavyweight division and he won his first three fights relatively easy against mediocre opponents before stepping up and facing his first true test against an elite fighter.  In his next fight, he faced Ezzard Charles in what would be the first of three fights.  Moore suffered a knockdown in the 8th round and and went on to lose a clear decision over the future Hall of Famer.

But Moore would not be discouraged.  He continued to fight elite opponents from that point on avenging his loss to Bivins, defeating Harold Johnson, Alabama Kid and many other top stars. He did lose to Charles on two more occasions, but by now it was clear that Moore deserved a shot at the Light-Heavyweight title.

Moore did everything possible to gain a title shot. He traveled around the world and campaigned in different towns, fighting local guys and after his fights, he would talk to reporters and issue a challenge to the champion, but for many years, champions ducked him. 

But in 1952, Moore finally received his well-deserved title shot against then-champion Joey Maxim, who was fresh off of a big win over the GREAT Sugar Ray Robinson winning a 14th round technical knockout when Robinson could not continue fighting due to heat prostration.  The 39 year old Moore took Maxim to school, hurting him several times with right hands and short, accurate punches. The fight went the distance and Moore won an easy decision and finally won the Light-Heavyweight championship.

Moore held on to the title for 10 years and he never lost his title in the ring, which is amazing considering he was 39 years old when he won the title.  Yet like Bob Foster and so many other Light-Heavyweights, Moore also wanted to become the Heavyweight Champion of the world. In 1955, he took on Heavyweight champion Rocky Marciano in what turned out to be Marciano's last fight. The Old Mongoose managed to knock down the iron-jawed Marciano early in the fight with a beautiful, counter right hand, but Rocky recovered and went on to stop Moore in the 9th round.

A year later, Moore received another crack at the title when he took on Floyd Patterson for the vacant Heavyweight title (due to Marcaino retiring undefeated). Moore fought well early on, but the much younger Patterson was just too fast for Moore and he was knocked out in the 5th round. And despite suffering those setbacks, Moore still ruled the Light-Heavyweight division with an iron fist during those 10 years. 

So why is Moore not the number one Light-Heavyweight of all time? Based on what he accomplished in that division,Moore was the greatest Light-Heavyweight "champion" of all time, there is no debate about that.  But in this particular article, I ranked the greatest "Light-Heavyweights" of all time, meaning I'm basing this on who was the best fighter who ever fought in that division. 

Archie Moore will go down in history as one of the hardest punchers of all time and one of the most craftiest technicians to ever lace them up. And while Bernard Hopkins is making a strong case, no one performed better after the age of 40 than the "Old Mongoose" Archie Moore.





1. Ezzard Charles "The Cincinnati Cobra"

Professional record: 93-25-1 with 52 KO's


Credentials: While he never challenged for the Light-Heavyweight title, he beat 4 Former Light-Heavyweight Champions. 


Biggest wins: Teddy Yarosz (UD 10) Joey Maxim (UD 10) Archie Moore (KO 8)  Jimmy Bivins (KO 4) Lloyd Marshall (KO 2)




Before I get started,  I'm well aware of the fact that Ezzard Charles did not win the Light-Heavyweight title. So why is the the Greatest Light-Heavyweight of all-time?  As I said earlier, this was a tough decision, but after doing the research, I could not vote any other way.

Born in Lawrenceville, Georgia on July 7th, 1921, Charles won several amateur championships, including two Golden Gloves titles in the Welterweight and Middleweight divisions. Charles was a complete fighter, who could out-box you or fight flat-footed and brawl.  Nicknamed the "Cincinnati Cobra"  Ezzard turned professional in 1940 as a Middleweight and he won his first 15 fights before losing his first fight to the more experienced Ken Overlin.

Charles regrouped and continued to fight tough opposition.  And keep in mind, this took place early in Ezzard's career.  Most young fighters were brought along slowly, but not Ezzard Charles.  After losing to Overlin, Charles won his next two fights before taking on Charley Burley.  Even though Burley was much more experienced, Charles dominated him from the opening bell and he won a clear decision over the future Light-Heavyweight champion. They fought again a month later and once again the Cincinnati Cobra proved to be too much for Burley and he won another unanimous decision.

Charles kept fighting tough opponents, beating Joey Maxim twice, he lost to Jimmy Bivins and Lloyd Marshall in his next two fights but he continued on. After winning his next 7 fights, he took on the legendary Archie Moore on May 20th, 1946.  Charles dropped Moore in the 8th round with a body shot and went on to win a lop-sided decision over the Old Mongoose.

Charles fought on and he avenged his losses to Lloyd Marshall and Jimmy Bivins, beating Marshall twice and Bivins on 4 different occasions. He also fought Moore two more times and won them both, stopping Moore in the 8th round in their third and final encounter. After disposing of Moore, Ezzard was at the top of his game, but nothing could prepare him for what was ahead of him in his next fight.

A month later, Charles fought a relatively unknown fighter named Sam Baroudi. For the first 5 rounds, Sam was very competitive but Charles took command of the fight in the middle rounds and went on to knock out Baroudi in the 10th round. Sadly, Baroudi died from injuries he sustained from his fight with Charles.

This tragedy devastated Charles and he considered retiring after this but after doing some soul searching,  he continued fighting a few months later. After failing to receive a shot at the Light-Heavyweight title (Champions ducked him), he moved up to the Heavyweight division in 1948. A year later, he took on the crafty Jersey Joe Walcott for the vacant NBA Heavyweight title (The World title was vacated because Joe Louis retired as champion). Charles won a hard-fought decision over Walcott and finally won his first world title but many boxing fans did not consider him the true champion because Louis never lost his title in the ring.

A year later, Louis came out of retirement and challenged Charles for his title and the winner would be recognized as the true World Heavyweight champion. This fight was a total mismatch. Louis looked like a shell of his former self and Charles dominated from start to finish. Charles won a unanimous decision over Louis and was now recognized as the Undisputed Heavyweight Champion of the world.

Charles went on to do more great things, but he was never quite the same fighter after the Baroudi tragedy. Before that unfortunate incident,  Charles was a deadly puncher who always looked for the knockout when his opponents were in trouble, but after this tragedy Charles still had his share of knockouts, but he lost some of his ferociousness and he would often take it easy on guys once he hurt them (as he did with Louis).

So why did I rank Charles number one over Moore?  As I mentioned earlier, this was a TOUGH decision but I had to look at both of their careers and compare them.  Both Charles and Moore fought and beat several Hall of Fame fighters, some of which were the same opponents (Joey Maxim, Harold Johnson, Jimmy Bivins, Lloyd Marshall and others) and they fought them several times.

The one thing that Moore has over Charles is the fact that he won the Light-Heavyweight title and he held it for over many years, but let's be honest--Moore received his shot at the world title when he was 39 years old because the people who controlled boxing at that time (The MOB) did not believe Moore would win the title at that age and Ezzard Charles did not receive his title shot because champions flat out ducked him.

The tie-breaker for me came down to what happened when those two faced each other. Charles and Moore fought 3 times and Charles dominated him all three times and those fights took place when they were both young and in their prime. If Charles would not have moved up to Heavyweight in 1948, do you believe  Archie Moore would have been champion for 10 years?  I don't believe so. So with all that being said, I could not rank Moore or anyone else ahead of the Cincinnati Cobra,  Ezzard Charles.

So there you have it ladies and gentlemen.  Please feel free to leave a comment and let me know what you think. Let the debates begin!!