Is There A Double Standard For GGG When Comparing Him To Other Great Fighters?

Currently in the sport of boxing, the biggest PPV draw in the sport (Floyd Mayweather Jr) is currently "retired" but he's considering making a comeback against a loudmouth MMA fighter (Connor McGregor) who just lost his last fight (it won't happen). The second most popular guy in boxing (Manny Pacquiao) is also "retired" and is now a Congressman in the Philippines. Up next, we have Middleweight title holder Canelo Alvarez, who just anesthetized a fighter (Amir Khan) who moved up two weight classes to face him. So who's the fourth biggest name in the sport? It's none other than the ruler of the Middleweight division, Gennady Golovkin (35-0 with 32 KO's), also known as Triple G. Some boxing pundits are already comparing the knockout artist to a young Mike Tyson and some believe he's an all-time great based on his 16 title defenses and all the knockouts, but there are a few fighters who believe GGG hasn't reached that plateau just yet. In recent interviews, HOF-bound legends Bernard Hopkins and Floyd Mayweather both stated that they (and many other GREAT fighters of the past) were willing to move up (and sometimes down) in weight to face tougher opposition. So the question vis this: Is there a double-standard for Triple G when comparing him to other great fighters?

Before I get into this, let me give you my thoughts on GGG. As I stated in a previous article, I believe  GGG is an amazing offensive fighter with KO power in both hands. He's destroyed everyone he faced and he's seems to be improving with each fight. With that said, I'm not completely sold on GGG because his defense is average and because he hasn't fought and beat an ELITE fighter yet. I know--GGG can only fight who they put in front of him, but until be beats a PFP top 10 fighter, please don't try to convince me that GGG is GREAT or the best fighter in the world, because you'd be wasting your time. I always believed that in order to be considered to be great, you have to fight and beat other great fighters, which is why when I rank fighters, I value quality of opposition more than a lengthy title reign vs above average fighters.

Now to be fair to GGG, he's stated on many occasions he wants to fight Floyd Mayweather and Canelo Alvarez. And if you believe Shane Mosley, GGG-Canelo has been signed, sealed and will be delivered on September 17th. I like and respect Shane Mosley, but I won't believe that fight is official until the Golden Boy himself (Oscar) announces it.

So is there a double standard for GGG? In a recent interview with Fighthubtv.com, a reporter asked  Bernard Hopkins about Triple G. Hopkins stated that when he was Middleweight champion, he moved DOWN in weight (157lbs) to make the fight with Oscar De La Hoya, he moved up two weight classes and he embarrassed Antonio Tarver to win the Light-Heavyweight crown and when he was the Light-Heavyweight King, he once again moved down in weight (170lbs) to fight Winky Wright. Simply put, Bernard Hopkins dared to be great. In another recent interview with Fighthype.com, when asked about GGG, Floyd said, "Triple G hasn't shown me any heart yet" because he wants to stay at Middleweight. Now some would argue that Middleweight legend Marvelous Marvin Hagler was also criticized by some for staying at 160 for his entire career and for not moving up to Light-Heavyweight to face Michael Spinks in the mid-80's, but instead, Hagler fought HOF legends Roberto Duran, Thomas Hearns and Sugar Ray Leonard. Like Hopkins, Mayweather and many others, the Marvelous One also dared to be great.

If GGG doesn't get the big fight that he so covets at Middleweight (vs Canelo or Floyd), would he be willing to move up in weight like so many great fighters of the past and take on tougher opposition like an Andre Ward or Sergev Kovalev? Or would Triple G be content with ruling the Middleweight division without facing an elite fighter? If he chooses the second option, that would be choice and he would probably be headed to the IBHOF when he retires.

Do I believe there's a double-standard where GGG is concerned? In some ways, I do believe there is, but to a certain degree. Many great fighters of the past like Hopkins, Mayweather and others had to move up in weight and take on top-level opponents before they were considered great, but many believe GGG is already a legend based on what he's done so far, even without facing an elite opponent. With that said, Triple G has plenty of time to prove to people like me that he's great and also, it's WAY too soon to be comparing him to legends like Hopkins and Mayweather because they're both near the end of their careers.

So the question is this: Will Triple G DARE to be GREAT??

Time will tell....

RC's Manny Pacquiao vs Timothy Bradley Quick Preview:

I have a question for you boxing fans: Are Manny Pacquiao and Timothy Bradley REALLY fighting this weekend? I ask because just a few short years ago, no one had to ask because Manny Pacquiao was the most exiting fighter in boxing and his promoter Bob Arum was promoting the hell out of his fights. How often has Bob Arum been on TV in the past few months?  Seriously, I know Manny Pacquiao (57-6-2 with 38 KO's) faces Timothy Bradley (33-1-1 with 13 KO's) for the vacant WBO International Welterweight title and Top Rank is promoting this trilogy but really, where's the buzz for this fight?

So why is this fight not as anticipated as their last two battles? Is this fight lacking interest due to the fact that Manny's arch-rival, Floyd Mayweather took him to school last May? Or is it because everyone has seen this movie before and we expect to see the same outcome? Is it because Manny announced this will be his last fight (like anyone really believes him)?  OR, is it because Manny Pacquio upset A LOT of people with his recent anti-gay comments that he apologized for and then later revised?  Either way, its clear that Pacquiao's popularity has taken a major hit.

As for Timothy Bradley, he recently acquired the services of longtime trainer Teddy Atlas and Bradley was impressive vs Brandon Rios in their first fight together, but is Atlas capable of coming up with the perfect game plan capable of neutralizing Manny? Will Bradley listen to Teddy and not revert back to what got him into trouble vs Pacquiao in their first two fights? One things for sure: Manny Pacquiao will be facing a different Timothy Bradley this Saturday night.

Keys to the Fight

Pacquiao: 

Go to the body early and often: When Manny was at his best, he threw body shots early and often. But over the past 5 years or so, Pacquiao has been strictly a head-hunter.  He has to go to the body vs Bradley in this fight in order to slow him down.

Use your counter, right hook: Remember when Manny used to hurt guys with his counter right hook? Its been a while since he's consistently used it, but against Bradley, the counter right hook could be the punch that Bradley's not ready for.

If the knockout comes, go for it, but don't look for it early on: I know--Timothy Bradley is not a knockout puncher, but neither was Juan Manuel Marquez and we all know what happened when Manny fought him in their 4th and final fight. If Manny hurts Bradley early, I'm sure he'll go for the KO, but he has to remember Bradley is as tough as nails and underestimating his power could prove to be a huge mistake.. 

Bradley: 

Keep the fight in the center of the ring: As we saw when Manny fought Marquez and Mayweather, Pacquiao can be out-boxed in the middle of the ring. Bradley is capable of controlling this fight in the center of the ring, as he did vs Marquez a couple years ago.

Counter Manny's jab with right leads: Pacquiao's right jab is not crisp and Bradley can take advantage of that by landing some effective counter right hands.

Throw short, accurate uppercuts when fighting Manny in close quarters: Manny has a tendency of coming in wild when he attacks in close quarters and Bradley does have an accurate right uppercut. Bradley's right uppercut could be his most effective punch in this fight.

Prediction:

I actually believe this fight will be very competitive. After trading early knockdowns and fighting on even terms for 10 rounds, Bradley will clearly out-work Manny in the last 2 rounds and edge out a close decision on most fans scorecards. But unfortunately for Bradley, the judges will view the fight in a different way.

 Manny Pacquiao wins a close and very controversial majority decision over Timothy Bradley...

Dream Match: Floyd Mayweather vs Roberto Duran

Boxing fans: It's been a while since I've put one of these together, but due to the fact that there's not that much going on right now in boxing and there's certainly no huge fights on the horizon, I thought it would be a good idea to discuss a mythical Dream Fight. In this match up, Hall of Famer Roberto Duran (103-16 with 70 KO's), the man who many believe is the greatest Lightweight of all time, will go up against arguably the greatest defensive fighter of all time who never tasted defeat: Floyd Mayweather Jr. (49-0 with 26 KO's).

Now before I break down this fight, a couple of things need to be established. The first obstacle was determining what weight class would this fight take place at. Obviously, Duran was at his absolute best at 135lbs and Floyd was an all-time great at 130lbs. I believe based on the fact that there's only a  5 pound difference (and because I'm not a fan of catch weight fights), this fight should be for Duran's Undisputed Lightweight Title. The second thing was determining if this fight should scheduled for 12 or 15 rounds. Duran went 15 rounds countless times in his career while Mayweather never has fought for 45 minutes in a fight, For a fight of this magnitude, this fight should be scheduled for 15.

And one last thing: Even though this fight will be fought at 135 lbs, this is a fight where both of them are at their best but also that means they will both bring all their knowledge and experience fighting all their past opponents with them.

Pre-Fight Hype

Both Duran and Mayweather were masters of trash talking and psychological warfare.  Before Duran faced Sugar Ray Leonard in Montreal, Duran made some crude comments about Leonard's wife and Leonard abandoned his original game plan. Big mistake. Advantage: Duran.  And before Floyd's fight with Oscar De La Hoya, he made fun of Oscar every chance he got and Oscar clearly was bothered by it. The trash talking between those two would be EPIC, in fact, the pre-fight interviews might be almost as exiting as the actual fight.

Here's an hypothetical exchange between Mayweather and Duran:

Floyd: "They call Roberto Duran the Hands of Stone. I'm not accusing him of cheating, but I want the boxing commissioners to make sure that Duran's hands are legally wrapped."

Duran (in Spanish): "F U Floyd, you're always making excuses. I've never cheated the game.  I once knocked out a horse with my bare hands and after I destroy you, the reporters will say I knocked out a clown who beats up women!"

Floyd: "Hey Roberto, most sportswriters say you're the greatest Lightweight of all-time and they say you were unbeatable, but you won the title by throwing an obvious low blow vs Ken Buchanan, you lost to Esteban De Jesus (in a non-title fight) and you never beat a Hall of Famer when you were Lightweight Champion. You QUIT against Leonard, you lost to Kirkland F'N Lang and Tommy Hearns put you to sleep!"

Duran: "Sure, I lost to De Jesus, but I stopped him twice after that. As for Leonard and Hearns, you couldn't carry their spit bucket and you would have ducked both of them, not to mention Hagler or Benitez. And you forgot to mention that I BEAT Sugar Ray Leonard when he was at his best. Yes, I didn't win all my fights, but unlike you, I NEVER ducked ANYONE! Guys like myself, Leonard, Hearns, Hagler and Benitez paved the way for guys like you and you wouldn't have been more than a mid-carder if you fought in my era!"


Keys to the fight:

Mayweather

Establish his jab to the head and especially to the chest.  Floyd's an underrated body puncher and his most effective body shot is his jab to the chest as his opponents come after him. The jab to the chest saps opponents energy and in this fight, he has to do something to slow Duran down, especially if this fight goes into the championship rounds.

Be more active offensively. Sometimes Floyd is too cautious and is too defensive minded. Going up against the Hands of Stone, Floyd must be willing to exchange with Duran while he's pressed against the ropes and when he's in he center of the ring, Floyd should counter Duran's jab with his Ali-like, counter right lead.

Duran

Force Mayweather into the ropes and do what you do best--maul and brawl with him. Duran has a very good jab and he was very good defensively, but Duran is at his best when he man-handles his opponents. Roberto was great at cutting off the ring and trapping his opponents in the ropes and smothering them with a barrage of effective punches. In order to beat this defensive wizard, he must do this vs Mayweather.

End every combination with a left hook, either to the head or body. Floyd often moves backwards when he's under attack and while his shoulder-roll defense is very effective, I believe Duran could be successful landing some meaningful left hooks and also wear Floyd down with his body shots.

The Fight

The first three rounds would be a fast-paced chess match with Floyd gaining an advantage. The two would fight mainly from the center of the ring with Floyd beating Duran to the punch with jabs to the head and chest and counter shots. Near the end of the third round, Floyd starts to taunt Duran, and even lands a Kid Gavilan-bolo punch that excites the crowd, but at the same time, it ticks off Duran.  (Floyd: 30-27) 

In the 4th round, Duran steps up the pace, forcing Mayweather into the ropes and keeping him there with accurate body shots and combinations. Floyd would land the occasional counter right lead, but Duran's work-rate would carry him through rounds 4 and 5 and give him the advantage.  Near the end of the 6th round, Duran sticks out his chin and invites Floyd to hit him. Floyd misses badly with a right lead and Duran lands a counter-left hook that stuns Floyd as the round comes to an end. Mayweather wobbles back to his corner on shaky legs. (Even: 57-57)

Believing Floyd hasn't fully recovered from round 6, Duran comes right after Floyd in the center of the ring out for blood in the 7th, but this will prove to be a mistake. While lunging towards Floyd near the ropes, Mayweather catches Duran with a check-left hook that drops him to the canvas. Duran jumps up at the count of 3, now angry and slightly embarrassed that he got caught coming in recklessly. Floyd realizes that Duran is not seriously hurt, so he doesn't go for the KO, but he does win the round by out-boxing Duran and beating him to the punch. (Floyd: 67-65) 

While winning rounds 8-9, Floyd begins to get a little over-confident, talking to Duran, fighting with his hands down and daring him to hit him. Huge mistake. Early in the 10th round, Duran catches Floyd with a bodacious, counter right hand that buckles his knees. Floyd stumbles back into the ropes and Duran follows him and lands another right hand followed with a hard left hook that knocks Floyd down. Mayweather gets up at the count of 5, but his legs are shaky and he's clearly hurt. Duran steps up the intensity and goes for the KO, but Floyd survives the round by grabbing and holding Duran as he got close to him. A HUGE round for Duran. The 11th round is ALL Duran, all the time. Midway through the round, Duran stuns Floyd again with a powerful right hand that almost dropped him and referee Carlos Padilla takes a real good look at Floyd, as if he was thinking of possibly stopping the fight but Floyd manages to survive Duran's attack. Another huge 10-8 round for the Hands of Stone.  (Even:103-103)  

Going into the 12th round, Duran's confidence is at an all-time high while Floyd has recovered from the whipping Duran laid on him in rounds 10-11. Duran is relentless, throwing punches with bad intentions while Floyd is defending well and landing some counter right hands and uppercuts when they fight in close. This was a close round, but Floyd landed the cleaner, more effective shots,  so he wins the 12th. Even though Mayweather never fought 15 rounds before, he seems to have fully recovered from Duran's power shots and he seems to have found his second wind, while Duran started to show signs of slowing down just a little bit. Floyd takes command and wins rounds 13-14 by out-working Duran, scoring with fast combinations and keeping the fight in the center of the ring.

In the 15th and final round, Duran goes all-out and tries to do everything he can to knock Mayweather out. Midway through the round, Duran rocks Floyd with a vicious right uppercut that staggers him, but Floyd would recover and respond with a vicious right hand that knocked out Duran's mouthpiece. Duran absorbed the shot as if he was shaking off rainwater an he proceeded to attack Mayweather with ruthless aggression while keeping him pinned against the ropes. Near the end of the round, Floyd manages to escape the ropes and for the last 10 seconds of the round and avoids Duran by dancing around the ring. As the bell sounds to end the fight, both guys believe they won, but it was clear Duran won the final round.

The Winner
Here's Michael Buffer the announcement:

Ladies and Gentlemen.....We have a Majority Decision... Judge Duane Ford scored the fight 141-141, a Draw.  Judge Harold Lettermen and Jerry Roth both score the fight 142-140 for the WINNER....AND..NEW... Undisputed Lighweight Champion of the World....FLOYD...MONEY....MAYWEATHER.  

RC'S Scorcard (142-140 Mayweather)

In the post-fight interviews, Mayweather said Duran was his toughest opponent he's ever fought, but he believes he won the fight while Duran believes he was robbed and that Floyd couldn't beat any of the guys in his era.

So there you have it folks.  I know many boxing fans that will disagree with me, but that's what makes the sport of Boxing such a great sport.

Let the debate begin!!

Why The Evolution Of Cam Newton Is Comparable To A Young Cassius Clay (Muhammad Ali)

When I watch an athlete who's arrogant, cocky and defiant, I'm normally a fan of said athlete. But when that athlete is also the best at what he does, then he has my full attention. Next week, Carolina Panthers QB Cam Newton, the soon-to-be MVP, will be playing for the chance to win his first Super Bowl title vs Peyton Manning and the Denver Broncos. I'm fascinated by Cam's evolution. What I mean by that is Cam no longer cares what his critics think of him - he probably figured they're going to hate on him anyways, so he might as well just be himself. Cam being himself might include some "dabbing", celebrating after running for a first down and taking pictures with his teammates before a game ends. But guess what: Cam's not the first athlete that showboated and who happened to be the best at what he did..

Back in the early 60's, there was a young man who was doing some of the same things Cam's doing now, but in a different sport. This guy predicted the rounds he would knock guys out (and his predictions would come true most of the time) and he would raise both of his hands over his prone opponents. Who am I referring to? A man who went by the name of Cassius Clay, who is better know as Muhammad Ali. That was just one example as to why I'm comparing the evolution of Cam Newton to Cassius Clay.  When I'm comparing these two, I'm comparing the Cam Newton of today to Cassius Clay right before he fought Sonny Liston for the Heavyweight title.

        Here's some more comparisons:   

• Cassius Clay and Cam Newton both won championships as amateurs. In 1960, Cassius Clay won the Gold Medal fighting as a Light-Heavyweight. And Cam Newton led his team to a National title in 2010 and he won the Heisman Trophy that same year. 

•  Both guys are once-in-a-lifetime athletes. When Cassius Clay/Ali was in his prime (1964-67) I'd never seen a Heavyweight who combined size, tremendous hand and foot speed and the ability to avoid punches like him. And some 50 years later, I still haven't seen any Heavyweight who I could compare to him to. And while Cam is just entering his prime, his rare combination of arm strength, running ability and size is something we haven't seen before. And if you don't believe me, Cam will remind you, as he did in his interview this past Wednesday. 

• Which brings me to my next comparison: Clay and Newton are both cocky, brash, defiant -- and a lot of people have a problem with that.  Back in the 60's, it was rare to see a fighter who exuded confidence like Cassius Clay -- in fact, former champions like Joe Louis and Rocky Marciano were very critical of Clay because they didn't appreciate all of the boasting and bragging. And Cam Newton is that same kind of cocky and defiant, and some former players (Brian Urlacher) and coaches are not too fond of Cam's antics.
  
  There's also this comparison: Both Clay and Newton are both polarizing and both of them had no problem saying that being black and being great at what they do makes certain people feel uncomfortable. Clay was far more outspoken about those topics after he won the title and when he converted to Islam (and changed his name to Muhammad Ali). It remains to be seen whether Cam will continue to be vocal discussing these topics as his career continues. 

So again, to be clear, I'm comparing the Cam Newton of today to Cassius Clay who was getting ready to fight for the Heavyweight title in 1964. We all know that Clay went on to become the Heavyweight Champion and arguably the greatest Heavyweight of all time. Cam Newton could make history this weekend by winning the NFL MVP award (which he most certainly will) and also a Super Bowl Championship. But here's the other side of the coin: What happens to Cam if he loses the Super Bowl? I'm sure his critics will come after him with both barrels but I'd be more interested in seeing how he would respond after the loss.

Who knows what the future holds for Cam Newton and time will tell if Cam will someday be mentioned with some of the great QB's of all-time like the man he's playing against in the Super Bowl next Sunday: Peyton Manning. Fortunately for us, were only one week away from being a little bit closer to finding out the answer.

Is Gennady Golovkin Hall Of Fame-Bound, Or Is He Overrated?

I've been a die-hard boxing fan for almost 40 years and one thing I've learned over the years is that in every era in boxing, there have been several good fighters, but very few GREAT ones. Many boxing boxing pundits consider the 2015 Fighter of the Year and current Middleweight king Gennady Golovkin (34-0, 31 KO's) to be a great fighter, already comparing him to legendary Middleweights like Marvelous Marvin Hagler, Carlos Monzon and Bernard Hopkins. My question is simply this: Is Triple G Hall of Fame bound, or is he overrated?

Now before I begin, let me discuss something that needs to be addressed. I've been in "writing exile" for the past 2 years. What that means is that I still followed boxing and other sports, but I just didn't have the desire to write about them anymore. But recently, I've regained my desire to write again, and I do believe I can offer a different perspective on a few sports topics, so I decided to give this a go once again. So let me apologize in advance if I'm a little rusty, but I'll get better with each article I write.

Now that I got that out of the way, lets get into this topic, shall we?

There's s lot to like about Gennady Golovkin, better known as Triple G. He's got power in both hands, he's a great body puncher, he has an underrated left jab and he has decent hand speed. When you go back and look at most great fighters of the past, most of them have had great amateur careers and GGG is no different. Golovkin had an outstanding amateur career, winning the World Amateur Boxing Championship in 2003 (with victories over Andy Lee and Lucian Bute and he won the final match vs Oleg Mahskin), and he won a silver medal in the Summer Olympics in 2004. After losing in the 2005 World Amateur tournament to Mohamed Hikal, he finished his amateur career with a record of 345-5.

Triple G turned pro in 2006 and in his 19th fight, he received his first World Title shot, as he faced Milton Nunez for the vacant WBA Middleweight title. Triple wasted no time, as he annihilated Nunez in the first round, winning the crown. A year later, he took on Lajuan Simon for the vacant IBO Middleweight strap and just as he did vs Nunez, he did away with Simon in the very first round, winning another World title.

GGG went on to win the Interim WBC crown, destroying Marco Antonio Rubio in 2 rounds and last October, he added the IBF Middleweight title to his collection, as he dismantled David Lemieux via an 8th round TKO. Simply put, Canelo Alvarez might be considered THE Middleweight champion because he beat the man who beat the man, but most boxing experts know who the best Middleweight in the world is, and that's Triple G.

So why am I asking whether or not Golovkin is Hall of Fame bound or is he a bit overrated? Well here's why. First off, considering how the IBHOF is turning into a popularity contest in some regards, it wouldn't surprise me if GGG isn't already penciled into the IBHOF.  He's undefeated, he's knocked out his last 21 opponents and he has a lot of title defenses, so I get that. Here's where I have a problem with the GGG supporters: People fall in love with all the knockouts but they're missing one point: He still hasn't fought and beat a top 10, elite fighter. I believe when it comes to boxing, it's not about how many people you beat, its about WHO you beat. Matthew Macklin, Daniel Geale and David Lemieux are all former title holders and decent fighters, but not elite or even top 10 caliber boxers.

Let me be clear about this: I LIKE Triple G. I think he's an outstanding offensive fighter and I love watching him box, but when folks start comparing him to legendary Middleweight champs like Hagler, Hopkins and Monzon, I find that to be laughable. Now to be fair to Triple G, he's destroyed everyone they put in front of him and I'm not taking anything away from what he's accomplished up to this point, but until I see him fight and beat an ELITE fighter, I won't be convinced that he's a great fighter. To explain my point further, I didn't consider Hagler to be an all-time great until he beat Hearns in 1985.

What I'm saying is this: I do believe Triple G has all the tools to someday be great and maybe someday he'll be the top guy in the sport, but I still need to see more. A lot more. Let's see how he fares vs Canelo if he fights him later this year or if Erislandy Lara moves up from Jr. Middleweight and challenges him someday.

Is Floyd Mayweather the Best Defensive Fighter of All Time?

Right now, boxing is still alive and well with several up and coming superstars but there's been one man who's been carrying the sport in his shoulders for the past 8 years - the current pound for pound king, Floyd "Money" Mayweather. He's shown no signs of slowing down at the age of 36 and looking at what's out there for him as potential opponents, I don't see anyone who can come close to beating him. With his shoulder-roll defense, his accurate counter-punching and supreme conditioning that he's managed to maintain over 18 years of fighting professionally, I have to ask this question: Is Floyd Mayweather the greatest defensive fighter of all time?

As boxing fans, we tend to preserve our heroes but we still try to be objective. For example, Muhammad Ali is my favorite fighter of all time and I believe he was the greatest Heavyweight of  all time because of the quality of opposition he faced during the course of his career. Other fighters have had longer title reigns, but none of them faced the amount of Hall of Famers as Ali did. 

Another example: For many years, I've considered Pernell Whitaker the greatest defensive fighter of all time because he could make defending a punch look like an art form while making his opponents look silly. I was a huge Sweet Pea fan since his amateur days and I could not picture anyone being as good or better than Whitaker defensively. Until now.

The reason why I ask if Floyd is the best defensive fighter of all time is because he's been able to maintain this level of defensive wizardry for a longer period of time than Whitaker did and also, Floyd has never been officially knocked down by a punch (although Zab Judah should have been credited for knocking Floyd down when Floyd's glove touched the canvas after absorbing a counter right hook in the second round of their fight). And while Whitaker was a brilliant defensive guru, he has been knocked down on a few occasions.

Part of being a great defensive fighter is having the ability to counter-punch and Floyd is clearly the best counter-puncher in the sport and the best I've seen since Wilfred Benitez. NO one in boxing history combines defensive excellence and pin-point counterpunching better than Mayweather, who's been boxing since he was knee high to a fly.

And a lot of old-timers might bring up Willie Pep as the best defensive fighter of all time and he was amazing (he won a round without throwing a punch once), but he's been stopped before (Hall of Famer Sandy Saddler stopped him 3 times) and he's been knocked down several times in his career.

The knock on Floyd for most of his career is that he hasn't faced any great fighters who were in their prime and that is true (the same could be said about Rocky Marciano), but Floyd has faced several Hall of Fame-caliber fighters ( Oscar, Mosley, Cotto, Gatti) and some very good fighters (Diego Corrales, Jose Luis Castillo, Ricky Hatton, Canelo).

For many years, I believe Pernell Whitaker was the greatest Defensive fighter of all time and he was, but when another fighter comes along and surpasses him in just about every category, I have no choice but to re-evaluate. Floyd Mayweather, based on his longevity, his counter-punching and because he's never really been knocked down, is the greatest Defensive fighter of all time.

The Three Blind Mice Beat Manny Pacquiao, Not Timothy Bradley

By Ronald "RC" Cameron

Usually after a big fight, I'll write a review shortly afterwards but after what I watched last weekend, I needed some time to cool off.  Three days after the fight, I'm still ticked off about what went down last Saturday night. We all know by now that Timothy Bradley is now the new WBO Welterweight Champion after "beating" Manny Pacquiao via a controversial (understatement of the year), split decision. Before I begin my mini-rant, let me first state that I have respect for Timothy Bradley as a fighter and he seems like a stand-up guy. He his moments and he took some big shots from Pacquiao and kept coming, but in all due respect to the new champ, Manny Pacquiao gave him a boxing lesson and Bradley was not consistently effective when he was aggressive. I scored the fight 119-109 for Manny. I watched the fight again 2 more times and I scored it the same way, only giving Bradley the 10th round.

Highway robbery.  No other way to put it.

 I've been watching boxing for over 35 years and I've seen my share of boxing travesties, but considering what was at stake, this one may have topped them all.  Am I totally shocked by this? In a word, no. This sort of thing has been taking place for MANY years. In the last 11 months, there have been several terrible decisions (Paul Williams vs Erislandy Lara and Brandon Rios vs Richard Abril come to mind) and there have been other fights that took place on a bigger stage in the past that ended just as bad ( Pernell Whitaker vs Julio Cesar Chavez, Lennox Lewis vs Evander Holyfield I, just to name a few) yet the outcome of this fight has angered so many fans who now believe we will never see the super-fight we all have been waiting for.  To the many fans who believe that fight will never take place: I believe the fight will still happen at some point. Remember how long it took before Sugar Ray Leonard finally fought Marvelous Marvin Hagler?  Exactly.


Who's Responsible For This Travesty: Bob Arum and The Judges 


So who is to blame for this travesty? Most boxing fans are pointing the finger at Top Rank's commander in chief, Bob Arum because he promotes both guys and he already had November 10th date reserved for Manny's next PPV fight. Arum said this after the fight: "I'll make a lot of money off the rematch, but this was outrageous."  Need I say more?  There are also people in the boxing media speculating that Pacquiao is considering leaving Arum and if that's the case, good for him. Most boxing promoters are like pimps and for the past 6 years, Manny has been Arum's number one "bottom bi%^$." But like a good pimp, (not that there is really such a thing) Arum knows that his top money maker is starting to slow down so he's trying to milk every but of use out of him before he does leave him.

Oscar De La Hoya and Floyd Mayweather both were promoted by Arum but once they both figured things out, they both were smart enough to leave him and promote themselves. Sugar Ray Leonard provided the best blueprint on how to promote himself and make millions and Oscar and Floyd took it to the next level. No one knows how long Pacquiao will continue to fight, but it's clear that he needs to leave Top Rank. The one thing that did puzzle me was watching Manny's reaction after losing the fight. When fighters are robbed, I mean REALLY robbed, they react accordingly. You all remember how Marvelous Marvin Hagler reacted to losing to Sugar Ray Leonard (That was NOT a robbery by the way) and who can forget Larry Holmes epic, "Kiss where the sun don't shine!" rant after losing to Michael Spinks for the second time (now THAT was a robbery) yet at the end of the Pac-Bradley fight after the decision was announced,  Pacquiao was all smiles and in a good mood . I have a lot of respect for Pacquiao; he's been the most exiting fighter in boxing for many years, but his reaction to being robbed was a bit odd to me.

And I know you didn't think I would forget about those blind judges, now did you?  I've mentioned this many times over the past year that several boxing judges have been horrendous and inconsistent as of late. While appearing on a radio show in Atlanta, former 3-time Light Heavyweight Champion Antonio Tarver took it a step further and suggested that those three judges "need to go to school and get a degree... in judging" and I totally agree with him.  And I know judge Jerry Roth scored the fight 115-113 for Pacquiao yet I still question what fight he was watching. As for judges Duane Ford and C.J. Ross, both of them should be fired on the spot. And to take this a step further, I'd like to see an independent investigator go and investigate all three judges.

Moving forward, we all know what's going to probably happen. Manny won't leave Arum, he will fight Bradley in November and will dismantle him and then maybe we will be closer to seeing the fight we REALLY want to see. In my opinion, Arum just wanted to get another payday out of Pacquiao in the event that Manny does leave him after the Bradley rematch. It's really a win-win for Bradley, Pacquiao and Arum if you look at it, yet us boxing fans are the ones who continue to buy the PPV's and put up with this crap.  I'm not going to go as far as boycotting the Pacquiao vs Bradley rematch, but I'll be damned if I will ever pay for another Bob Arum-led PPV again. I'm a boxing fan for life, so I'll watch the replay of his PPV fights but Arum won't get another red cent out of me until he gets his act together and starts to give die hard boxing fans fights we want to see and I would not hold my breath for that if I were him. And I'm now convinced that it's not Pacquiao or Mayweather who was holding up their potential showdown; it was Arum all along.

And please, don't come at me with the "he got what he deserved", "karma" excuse. I'm referring to those who feel that Manny got what was coming to him in part because of what happened last November in Vegas when Manny fought Juan Manuel Marquez for the third time and won a controversial majority decision. And thinking that way also speaks to how certain fans and boxing media members REALLY feel about Manny Pacquiao for whatever reason. For the record, I thought Marquez won that fight by a point, but I didn't have a problem at all with Manny winning the fight and I would not have protested if the fight would have been ruled a draw. It was a close fight. There's a difference between being ROBBED or losing a close fight and what we saw last weekend was a travesty at the highest level.

I've thought about different reasons as to why this happened this way and there is one more thing that no one is really talking about. Manny offended A LOT of people with his recent comments stating that he's against gay marriages and maybe someone who's in a position of power might have held that against him. For the record, I support gay marriages. I have friends who are gay and I believe they should have the right to live their lives in any way they choose to. But Manny Pacquiao is a huge name worldwide and his comments really rubbed people the wrong way and maybe he offended the wrong person (meaning one of the two judges or Arum).  And again, let me clear: I'm not saying that this is the reason why Manny got screwed, I'm just throwing this out there as a possible conspiracy theory.  


Until There's A National Commission In Place, This Will Continue And Promoters Will Laugh All The Way To The Bank


So how do we fix this?  I've said this for many years: Boxing needs a national commission. Whether it's a group of guys or one person, someone who has the authority to step in and do something about these corrupt judges and promoters who are as I mentioned before, that are no better than pimps. Judges and promoters are rarely held accountable for their incompetence and that needs to change. I really feel bad for the fighters because they're the ones who put their lives on the line when they step in the ring and once they can no longer profit the promoters, their treated like crap. Boxing is in some trouble right now. I'm not going to go as far as to say boxing is dead, but it's in the hospital emergency room and will be headed to hospice if it doesn't get its act together soon. Boxing fans--do what you want, continue to buy Arum's PPV's if you so choose but continuing to accept this nonsense will not solve the problem, it will only add to it.